Three Mile Island NRC ReportBy Patrick Mondout
What follows is part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)
report regarding the accident at Three
Mile Island.
Introduction
This section will provide a brief description of the accident
at Three Mile Island Unit 2 that occurred on March 28, 1979. Also, the
core damage and release of radioactive material will be discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Babcock & Wilcox Design |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background Design
Three Mile Island is a Babcock & Wilcox design pressurized water
reactor. The reactor coolant system consists of the reactor vessel, two
steam generators, four reactor coolant pumps, and the pressurizer. The
above figure shows the layout of the reactor coolant system inside the
reactor building (containment).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Pressurizer Relief Valve |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of Coolant Pressure
Following a reactor trip, the pressurizer relief valve stuck open
(shown above), causing a gradual loss of coolant pressure. Upon sensing
the loss of coolant pressure, safety equipment automatically started, but
was stopped in order to prevent the pressurizer from overfilling with
water. Also, the amount of water being removed from the coolant system to
the purification system was increased because of the high level in the
pressurizer. The resultant low pressure and high temperature caused the
coolant to boil. The low coolant pressure required the turning off of the
reactor coolant pumps. With little or no cooling available to remove decay
heat, the reactor fuel rods started to crack and break down due to the
high temperatures. Some radioactive fission products (mostly gases such as
xenon and krypton) were released into the coolant.
Core Damage
Later, the pressurizer relief valve was isolated, and reactor coolant
pumps were restarted. The starting of the reactor coolant pumps caused
cold water to be pumped onto the now very hot and very brittle fuel rods,
causing severe core damage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Major Release Point |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of Fission Products
Fission products (mostly gases) escaped from the damaged reactor core
into the reactor coolant system. Due to the stuck open pressurizer relief
valve, the pressurizer relief tank pressure increased to the point of
rupturing the rupture disk. The coolant was now being released into the
containment building atmosphere. The coolant entering the containment was
being collected in the sump. Upon reaching a high sump level, the sump
pumps automatically started and pumped the water to the auxiliary
building. The fission product gases in the coolant were picked up by the
auxiliary building ventilation and blown out the plant stack.
Containment Contamination
The rupture of the pressurizer relief tank severely contaminated the
containment. Also, due to the high concentration of fission products in
the water from the containment sump and the water in the purification
system, the auxiliary building had to be evacuated.
Major Release Point
The major release point was the waste gas system. The fission product
gases were being stripped out in the volume control tank and vented to the
waste gas system. A leak in the waste gas system allowed the gases to be
blown out the ventilation stack via the auxiliary building ventilation
system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Void Area |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Damage
Television cameras, lowered into the reactor core, indicated a large
void area where the top half of the core should be. Also, a bed of rubble
(fuel pellets, fuel rod debris, etc.) was found on the top of the lower
half of the core. The exact condition of the lower portion of the core was
not determined for several more years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Fuel Melt |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel Melt
Disassembly of the reactor core revealed a significant amount of fuel
melt. A portion of the molten core had flowed laterally after melting
through the stainless steel core support assembly. That material then
flowed down to the lower portion of the reactor vessel, where it cooled
and became a solid material again. As shown in the diagram, some of the
lower portion of the fuel assemblies remained intact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
Vessel Cutaway |
|
|
| |
|
NRC image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material Removal
By the end of May, 1989, most of the internals of the vessel had been
removed. The diagram above shows the cutaway of the vessel as of May,
1989. The material removed from the vessel has been placed in canisters
and shipped from the site.
Radiological Consequences
The principal cause of exposure for individuals in the pathway of the
release was noble gases (primarily xenon). Below is a summary of the
radiological consequences of the Three Mile Island accident.
Maximum Projected Offsite Dose:
Less than 100 millirems
Average Dose to Population:
Approximately 1.4 millrems/person
Projected Additional Cancers:
0 to 1
Bibliography
Mike Gray, Ira Rosen, The
Warning: Accident at Three Mile Island, W.W. Norton & Company,
2003.
Wilborn Hampton, Meltdown:
A Race Against Nuclear Disaster at Three Mile Island: A Reporter's Story,
Candlewick 2001.
Bonnie A. Osif, Anthony J. Baratta, Thomas W. Conkling, TMI
25 Years Later: The Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant Accident and Its
Impact, Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.
J. Samuel. Walker, Three
Mile Island : A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective, University
of California Press, 2004.
M.S. Wood, Suzanne M. Shultz, Three
Mile Island: A Selectively Annotated Bibliography, Greenwood Press,
1988. |